[PRCo] Re: PATransit March Service

[Derrick Brashear]

technically correct, but the incumbent, uh, well, the person asking to be recalled shows no particular intent to not leave them in the lurch again next year. 


Derrick


On Mar 27, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Herb Brannon <hrbran at cavtel.net> wrote:

> According to this short, to the point, article the March service cuts were
> not necessary inasmuch as temporary funding is being provided by the
> Commonwealth to see PAT through the end of the year.
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 21:09, Herb Brannon <hrbran at cavtel.net> wrote:
> 
>> OK. Let me try to scan this article in 'IN TRANSIT' and post it.
>> Interesting article.
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 20:23, Derrick Brashear <shadow at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> they were, according to the Port Authority's twitter account earlier
>>> today.
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Herb Brannon <hrbran at cavtel.net> wrote:
>>>> Anyone know if the March service changes were implemented at PAT?
>>>> If the were then I will post a news story to The List, if they were not
>>> then
>>>> the story was premature.
>>>> --
>>>> Herb Brannon
>>>> In Cuyahoga Valley National Park
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Derrick
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Herb Brannon
>> In Cuyahoga Valley National Park
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Herb Brannon
> In Cuyahoga Valley National Park
> 
> 
> 
> -- Attached file removed by Ecartis and put at URL below --
> -- Type: application/pdf
> -- Size: 879k (900578 bytes)
> -- URL : http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/In%20Transit%20Pg%2010001.pdf
> 
> 
> -- Attached file removed by Ecartis and put at URL below --
> -- Type: application/pdf
> -- Size: 709k (726285 bytes)
> -- URL : http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/In%20Transit%20Pg%2020001.pdf
> 
> 
>