[PRCo] Re: McKeesport

[Phillip Clark Campbell]

My goodness it gets worse;  the Carnegie website is as bad
as the videos of McKeesport.  A multitude of hoops just to find
photos and then it is necessary to click on 'baseball icons' to
navigate.  Thumbs of the photos don't begin to represent the
underlying photo.  It seems every other one is a construction
worker flexing muscles;  how many does one need?
Many photos identical to University site.
 

Phil






________________________________
From: Phillip Clark Campbell <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Sent: Sun, May 15, 2011 11:50:03 AM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: McKeesport

Yes, Ray, that is an excellent idea.  The museum depends
upon donations, sales, grants not having regular income
like business.  Thus photos can be a source of identification
and income which poses problems in posting.  There is
an answer;  just don't know how that can be approached.

Phil

________________________________
From: Ray <rayprco53 at verizon.net>
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Sent: Sun, May 15, 2011 10:58:55 AM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: McKeesport

I agree the special effects were way overboard.

You might try clpgh.org to see if these photos
are online at the Carnegie  library. I wish PTM could do 
some thing with the University of Pittsburgh
and their Historic Pittsburgh web site and put their
collection on line.

Ray


May 15, 2011 09:14:33 AM, pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org wrote:

===========================================

Yes, interesting content but the most hellish video
I have ever watched.  A different special effect every
photo is massive overkill isn't it.  It is highly
annoying.  Does the Carnegie library have online
photos?

Phil

________________________________
From: Ray 
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Sent: Sat, May 14, 2011 7:21:06 PM
Subject: [PRCo] McKeesport


Pretty interesting. Some cool PRCo shots in Part 3. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bw4HgtpGMgI&feature=related

Ray