[PRCo] Re: 'maybe' not East McKeesport
Edward H. Lybarger
trams2 at comcast.net
Sat Nov 26 11:25:05 EST 2011
What about the Lincoln Highway in the Loyalhanna gorge through Chestnut
Ridge, with the Ligonier Valley RR adjacent?
-----Original Message-----
From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementix.org
[mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementix.org] On Behalf Of John
Swindler
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2011 9:38 AM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
Subject: [PRCo] Re: 'maybe' not East McKeesport
How about "east of McKeesport"???
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:20:19 -0800
> From: pcc_sr at yahoo.com
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: 'maybe' not East McKeesport
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
>
> I wondered the same about a river, Mr.Swindler.
> Coupling that with Mr.Barry's comments make the position of RR and
> Trolley track seemed reversed doesn't it. RRs often follow river
> valleys. Seems to be a rather large yard possible here, or several
> passing tracks. The few RR cars seem to be on a grade compared to the
> "main" in the foreground.
>
>
> Mr.Brannon noted the foliage; the hill seems steep and high for Pgh.
> area. Because of OH reference I
>
> thought of Ohio River Valley of Wheeling area. It has been 5-decades
> since being that way; I can't remember steepness of hills.
>
>
> To reconsider the E-McKeesport link I am looking at the WP maps along
> the Youghiogheny yet all alignments here seem to put the RR against
> the river cancelling the alignment in the picture. I was never along
> this river so am not familiar with the hills; they would still seem to
> be lower than those in the picture.
>
> The WP map shows "East McKeesport" as between Wilmerding and Trafford.
> There is a creek/river and RR running east-west; the RR branches to
> both sides of the river east of E-McKeesport. This would then suggest
> the Trafford line. Hills here seemed to be higher than those closer
> to Pgh. Still much of the trolley line allowed the RR closer to the
> river as I remember, at least latter day alignment. Mr.Barry may have
> hit the nail on the head.
>
>
> "East McKeesport" must be marked on the photograph for it to be
> included here. Whether location or address of photographer or other
> could be debated.
>
> It seems the Stewarts left one "key word" out of their
> description: "1974" Anyone familiar with local or PA state license
> plates in 1906?
>
> Has everyone assured their Black Friday deals?
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: John Swindler <j_swindler at hotmail.com>
> >To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
> >Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 9:29 AM
> >Subject: [PRCo] Re: not East McKeesport
> >
> >I was wondering if there was a river off of the left side of the
picture???? The collection includes some pix from southern Ohio. Could
this have been enroute, perhaps around the Steubenville area?? As a
disclaimer, this is total speculation NOT based on any evidence.
> >
> >Happy Thanksgiving holiday
> >John
> >
> >
> >> From: mrb190 at pitt.edu
> >> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
> >> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:08:05 -0500
> >> Subject: [PRCo] Re: not East McKeesport
> >>
> >> The first thing that came to my mind was that it was the Trafford
route. But, the railroad tracks should be below the streetcar tracks.... Not
sure.
> >>
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementix.org
> >> [pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementix.org] On Behalf Of
> >> Derrick Brashear [shadow at gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 10:03 PM
> >> To: Pittsburgh Railways Group
> >> Subject: [PRCo] not East McKeesport
> >>
> >> so where the heck is it?
> >> http://bradystewartphoto.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/20th-Centur
> >> y-Automobiles-Trucks-and-Boats/G0000flbWWbccdiw/I0000RZxXcxRETYA
> >>
> >> --
> >> Derrick
> >
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list