[PRCo] Re: Fw: [Mileage] PAT Penn Sta. Spur

Derrick Brashear shadow at gmail.com
Mon Apr 16 19:49:52 EDT 2012


On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Dwight Long <dwightlong at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Derrick
>
> Apparently Rt. 52 was not only not a peer, but also not a payer. Had it
> been, no doubt PRC would have put a loop at its upriver end and run Rt. 50
> cars through.

I did once find a map showing when the track had gone all the way
through to Hays, but presumably once the PRCo underliers merged it
became
sufficiently not a payer that it was cut to 36th St, a.k.a. "Williamsburg".

> As to the tram route numbers vs PAT ones, just review the name of this
> list.When in Rome---------

Context is everything. In the context of bus numbers, the name of this
list would give me 200-series numbers, at least in some cases, yes?
And we didn't even touch those.


-- 
Derrick



More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list