[PRCo] Re: PRC Rt. 23

[Derrick Brashear]

an embedded photo is just as dangerous. i can forward you computer
security research on the topic,
but you'd have to click the link to read it.

regardless, presuming that just because an image was embedded in your
email that it is safe
is a dangerous understanding, and one i'm not going to let stand with comment.

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Dwight Long <dwightlong at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Phil
>
> You are missing the point.  The point is that one should not have to click
> on links, attachments, or any of the other no-nos in the cyber world to be
> able to see a photo, chart, table, whatever--especially when it is placed
> into the body of the message specifically for that purpose.  Ecartis defeats
> all this through its machinations.
>
> Dwight
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
> To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 9:10 PM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: PRC Rt. 23
>
>
>> From: Derrick Brashear <shadow at gmail.com>
>> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
>> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 9:03 PM
>> Subject: [PRCo] Re: PRC Rt. 23
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Phillip Clark Campbell
>> <pcc_sr at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Mr.Long,
>>>
>>> They are in this email you sent at the bottom; the Urls are still there.
>>> I copied and am pasting them here also. Please check the bottom
>>> of this email to confirm the Urls are present; pictures are never
>>> included.
>>
>> The "dreaded ecartis" has them. Never mind that it's only dreaded to him.
>> You
>> can find his rationale in the archive. I respect that he's consistent
>> about it
>> even if I disagree.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Derrick
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> I don't understand Mr.Brashear. The Urls for the pictures I sent were
>> in the email he responded to; I clicked on them to get the pictures.
>> The mail program did not strip them.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Derrick