[PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
John Swindler
j_swindler at hotmail.com
Wed Sep 26 23:30:16 EDT 2012
Just providing a link to a document on Pittsburgh Ry. that is NOT on the Pittsburgh digital history site. The table of car assignments was the point at which I thought others might be interested in this volume. There was also the suspicion that I could easily waste a lot of time over analyzing this car assignment table. That said - I'll have another look at the table. It gives car assignments before and after initiation of two digit route numbers. As for interurban routes - maybe the author forgot to add together cars dispatched from both Castle Shannon and Charleroi car houses??????? Just a possibility.
> From: dwightlong at verizon.net
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:34:18 -0400
>
>
> John
>
> Only one car on Washington and two on Charleroi?
>
> Either something is wrong here or I am missing something?
>
> Dwight
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Swindler" <j_swindler at hotmail.com>
> To: "Pittsburgh Railways" <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:45 PM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
>
>
> > Just adding something else to ponder. Not from Pittsburgh digital site.
> > (sending as email improves my chances of finding in future)
> > http://books.google.com/books?id=5XYrAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA9#v=onepage&q&f=false
> > > Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:22:05 -0700
> >> From: pcc_sr at yahoo.com
> >> Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
> >> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
> >>
> >> Mr.Brannon! You definitely have "something" with the extra hanger;
> >> it is in a different-higher plane than the running wires with 'span wire'
> >> that disappears at the left running wire. Also note how the two outside
> >> wires 'appear' further apart at the next span; they should appear
> >> closer shouldn't they.
> >> The truck appears fine to me but it can be the monitor, my eyes, a
> >> combination of these can't it.
> >>
> >> I am not convinced of a burn-in or feathering for hilites. That over
> >> "Mon City" looks chopped and ragged. It still gives a 'hint' of a
> >> picture through the back window of an auto.
> >>
> >> To consider other possibilities, double exposures were a problem
> >> if the film wasn't wound or the photographer forgets not winding.
> >>
> >> The asphalt paving at this time and the surrounding construction
> >> suggests something recent where a temporary shoofly might be
> >> built on top of the roadway on our left for bi-directional travel.
> >> Another trolley wire(s) could be strung for temporary use.
> >>
> >> Probably not photoshopped but could be dark room magic of
> >> the day to accomplish something similar just for fun. It is a
> >> charter so why not go further and create something unusual.
> >>
> >> Shall we ever know for certain?
> >>
> >>
> >> Phil
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >________________________________
> >> > From: Herb Brannon <hrbran at cavtel.net>
> >> >To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
> >> >Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:52 PM
> >> >Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
> >> >
> >> >As long as I keep seeing rear-truck wheels which do not match up to the
> >> >running-rails in the street and as long as I keep seeing a "third"
> >> >trolley wire hangar in between the two outside trolley wires it is
> >> >pretty obvious that this is a made-up job.
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list