[PRCo] *In Pittsburgh...* *......the Greatest City In The U.S.*
Herb Brannon
hrbran at cavtel.net
Sun Nov 24 12:18:31 EST 2013
So what if the ridership is down? That's why public transit, in most places
in the US, has a tax to support it. It must be treated as any urban
necessary utility. Now if you want some really negative figures then take a
look at what police, fire and ems services cost. I'm at a loss as to why
you constantly put forth all these figures. So, the ridership is not the
same as it was years ago. Should we just get rid of public transit? What
are you trying to say???
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Fred Schneider <fwschneider at comcast.net>wrote:
> Do not know where you find positive Cleveland numbers…..
>
> Since it was not posted to the website, I can only believe the year over
> year steady gains were revenue losses or ridership losses that impressed
> you.
>
> Light rail, aka Shaker Rapid … Peak year was 1948 with 7.437 million. In
> 1996 they hauled 3.847 million. In 2012 it was 2.855 million fares. The
> 1995 and 2013 numbers were those that the RTA reported to APTA.
>
> The heavy rail numbers for 1995 and 2013 sere 5.140 million and 6.240
> million. Herb Brannon once told me that the highest average weekday
> volume before the airport extension was around 50,000 a day … that would be
> about 15 million a year.
>
> Bus numbers for 1995 were 50.2 million and for 2012 38.5 million.
>
> Overall, including demand responsive riders, it has dropped 10.6 million
> a year since 1996, not risen. It has dropped 22% while the population has
> done down about 21% in the same period … cannot tell exactly because we can
> only extrapolate the the population drop in the intercensal periods. But
> it looks like its going down proportionally with the loss of people living
> in Cleveland.
>
> Here is the APTA website:
>
> http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/ridershipreport.aspx
>
> On Nov 24, 2013, at 8:10 AM, PC wrote:
>
> > I was very much impressed with Cleveland transit statistics Mr.Brannon;
> they realized year over year steady gains. One would suspect such to be
> 'a' measure
> > of economic health--people traveling back and forth to work and-or to
> shopping. Yet the situation for the nation is still bad; maybe Cleveland
> is still doing better than the
> > average nationally.
> >
> > The city has received some bad press with the women captives recently
> released and negative police reports. But such is possible most anywhere
> today.
> >
> > I have not been in Pgh in decades. I shall look into these books.
> >
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pittsburgh-railways mailing list
> Pittsburgh-railways at mailman.dementix.org
> https://mailman.dementix.org/mailman/listinfo/pittsburgh-railways
>
--
Herb Brannon
*In Pittsburgh.............................A City AndAnd A State of Mind*
Let's Go Pens
Let's Go Steelers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.dementix.org/pipermail/pittsburgh-railways/attachments/20131124/6219ff3b/attachment.html
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list