[milwaukee-electric] Re: Theory on the Fond du Lac Training Loop

[Scott Greig]

Wouldn't the expense of shifting one existing wire, hanging another, and modifying three cars have been greater than sending two guys in a truck with a welder and a bucket of bonds to upgrade the loop?
--- On Thu, 11/19/09, Ken and Tracie <ktjosephson at embarqmail.com> wrote:


From: Ken and Tracie <ktjosephson at embarqmail.com>
Subject: [milwaukee-electric] Theory on the Fond du Lac Training Loop
To: milwaukee-electric at lists.dementia.org
Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 6:54 AM

Content-Type: text/plain;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Okay, we all know the cars on the training loop used a negative return =
wire like trackless trolleys and Cincinnati/Havana/Merrill streetcars =
after the loop was isolated from the remainder of the rail system.

I still do not understand why a jumper cable could not have been run =
from the rails of the loop to the trackless trolleys' negative return =
feeders.

Does anybody know the reason the loop was converted to twin wires? =
Safety concerns? Bad rail bonds on the loop?=20

I remember visiting Orange Empire during the 1990s. There was a bad rail =
bond by the depot which would shoot sparks if a nearby car was drawing =
power.=20

I am wondering if the rail bonds were bad and M&ST decided twin wires =
was a more economical solution than restoring bonds on training trackage =
which was going to be redundant within a decade?=20

Any thoughts on this?

K.


-- Attached file removed by Ecartis and put at URL below --
-- Type: image/jpeg
-- Size: 160k (163993 bytes)
-- URL : http://lists.dementia.org/files/milwaukee-electric/tmcity060.jpg