Purity of Pittsburgh Railways
John Swindler
j_swindler at hotmail.com
Fri May 12 16:27:02 EDT 2000
Well, Fred,
what is the viewpoint of "major domo" on current events close to Pittsburgh?
(appears that both PAT and Bergan are modern light rail lines engineered
(?) with bad cases of the "slows".)
I think Derrick owns at least 51% of the stock in this mail list. Besides,
isn't there a delete key for messages straying from ones particular
specialization?
John Swindler,
p.s. who always enjoys current rail transit updates.
>From: "Fred W. Schneider III" <fschnei at supernet.com>
>Reply-To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>To: "pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org" <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
>Subject: Purity of Pittsburgh Railways
>Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:56:50 -0400
>
>I received an off-line complaint yesterday from one of the subscribers
>explaining that this address is to be used only to discuss Pittsburgh,
>Johnstown, and West Penn, and that my inclusion of news on the
>Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Line was totally inappropriate.
>
>I apologize for providing the readers with inappropriate material. I
>will no longer provide the readers of this web address with information
>on any properties other than those three western Pennsylvania systems.
>
>If any of the readers are interested in my wanderings and observations,
>please contact me personally with your name and e-mail address at
><fschnei at supernet.com> and I will try to remember to add your address to
>a separate mailing. Within the coming months, I do expect to spend some
>time on some of the Swiss systems plus a variety of western United
>States operations.
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list