[PRCo] Re: 46--line vs 49--line

[John Swindler]

Interesting.  Thank you.


>From: HRBran99 at aol.com
>Reply-To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>Subject: [PRCo] Re: 46--line vs 49--line
>Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 20:50:51 EDT
>
>In a message dated 6/11/01 12:07:27 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>j_swindler at hotmail.com writes:
>
>
> > So what was listed for route 49 in 1942????????
> >
>
>Route 49 did not exist in the 1942 guide. Route 46 was the 49.
>
>HrB
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com