[PRCo] Re: Route Knowledge

Edward H. Lybarger twg at pulsenet.com
Mon Apr 22 10:11:44 EDT 2002


The route numbers indeed differed from the destination numbers.  We tend to
use the terms interchangeably, but until the late 1930s they were quite
separate.

-----Original Message-----
From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
[mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org]On Behalf Of Jim
Holland
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:39 AM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: [PRCo] Re: Route Knowledge



Good Morning!

ED:	I think that what was originally referred to here was the
*listing--of--routes*  as  *Paper--Work*  with numbers which did not
necessarily correspond to those displayed on the equipment.   Such a
listing was made in 1910--1920 and we have discussed it before - may have
even run over 100.

	Basically, Interurban equipment diaplay  DESTINATION  signs because they
are travelling from one city to another (usually but not always without
numbers)   ---   while city routes display  ROUTE  signs because they work
intra-city, and these signs are usually preceeded by numbers and//or
letters.   Think that Don Galt originally shared this information and may
have been that the interurbans and Washington//Dopnoro locals were numbers
in the 100s.

	Shannon was the only interurban to display a number   ---   37--SHANNON
---   in PRCo days.   Library and Drake did not display numbers until well
into  ({[pat]})  days.   Whether or not they qualified for same is another
story   ---   could LIBRARY qualify as a separate destination?   If true,
then McKeesport and other routes could have displayed Destination signs as
well.

	Hope this doesn't take on a life of its own!(:->)

> "Edward H. Lybarger" wrote:

> Because these routes didn't have numbers until the '50s, when it really
> didn't matter any more!

>> tsquare wrote:

>> Another question:  It's obvious that the Route Numbers
>> generally work counter-clockwise around the City --
>> therefore, why are the Washington interurban line (36)
>> amd the Charleroi line (35) reversed?

>>> On Behalf Of Jim Holland::

>>>         Because of Chronology  --  Charleroi already existed when
Washington was
>>> built?!?!?!?!(:->)

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

James B. Holland

Holland  Electric  Railway  Operation.......
___"O"--Scale St.-Petersburg Trams Company Trolleycars and...
______"O"--Scale  Parts  mailto:pghpcc at pacbell.net

______Pennsylvania Trolley Museum http://www.pa-trolley.org/
___Pittsburgh  Railways  Company  (PRCo),   1930  --  1950
N.M.R.A.  Life member #2190; http://www.nmra.org

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>






More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list