[PRCo] 1700s vs. 1600s

[Fred Schneider]

Interesting ...

what was wrong with the 1600s?

I know from an operator's view point, a 1700 is a nice car to run (if you don't
mind being in an inferno).  Was it justy simply an air car?  Was in the fact that
there is always a delay between dynamics fading and air coming on?

HRBran99 at aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 3/3/03 11:49:57 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> j_swindler at hotmail.com writes:
>
> > John S., (observer of weekday 76 Hamilton cars sitting at Jane St. used to
> > put late motormen back on-time).
> >
> >
>
> These cars/buses (depending on type of equipment on route) were known as a
-- Trailing quotes stripped by Listar --