[PRCo] Re: Route 53 and Route 75

[James B. Holland]

Think Matt's question is more along the lines of:::::::

"""Since route 53 trolleycars were permanently rerouted to route 47, why 
didn't it carry route 47 destination signs instead of route 53?"""



Jim__Holland


I__Like__Ike.......And__PCCs!!

down with pantographs ---- UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!!!!!




Edward H. Lybarger wrote:

> Because there weren't enough buses on hand to do it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
> [mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org]On Behalf Of 
> Matt Barry
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:30 AM
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> Subject: [PRCo] Route 53 and Route 75
>
>
> Here a couple other Joe Testagrose photos that are currently on 
> alt.binaries.rail.
> The first is a great shot of route 75 Wilkinsburg gliding along Penn 
> Avenue.
>
> The second is a shot of route 53 coming up Warrington Ave on July 1, 
> 1968. I guess this was shortly after the tracks on South 18th street 
> into the South Side were abandoned and what was route 47 Carrick via 
> Tunnel became known as 53 Carrick. There is a cardboard sign in the 
> window indicating that the car goes through the Tunnel and up 
> Warrington. I wonder why 53 Carrick as it was wasn't just retired as a 
> route when teh south 18th street tracks were abandoned, in favor of 
> instituting the rush hour 47 as a regular route?
>
> http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/PAT1751onRt75atPenn%26SouthMurtland1-23-67TW.jpg
>
> :
> http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/PAT1767onRt53atWarrington%26Allen7-1-68TW.jpg