[PRCo] PCC__Weights
James B. Holland
PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com
Wed Jun 1 05:59:30 EDT 2005
Fred Schneider wrote:
> Rule number one ... never believe everything in books. The data in the
> Schneider / Carlson books is more reliable than many books but there
> is no such thing as perfect.
Sounds Like a Good item to keep available for a Quote in the Future!!
(:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D
> I would suspect that if the interurban cars were lighter, the weight
> loss is related to the difference between B2 and B3 trucks.
Suspect same -- seem to recall that the text somewhere indicates
something similar. Chart shows 37,423-pounds for 1725--1799 and
36,902-pounds for 1700--1724, a difference of 521-pounds.
> "James B. Holland" wrote:
>
>> Dietrich, Robert J. wrote:
>>
>>> The two Mt. Washington photos show interurban cars. Does anyone have
>>> an explanation for this? We were never privileged enough for
>>> interurban cars.
>>
>> Could be a charter.
>>
>> Also, according to one motorman, PRCo would put the interurbans out
>> on various lines in snow as they were *heavier* and tracked better.
>> This is what the motorman claimed when I rode one 17xx interurban on
>> the 42-Dormont to downtown one evening for the PRMA meeting. Trouble
>> is, according to the PCC books, the 17xx Interurbans are several
>> hundred pounds lighter than their City Cousins!!!!!!!
>>
>> Maybe the pilot acted like a plow!!!
>>
>> Jim__Holland
>>
>> I__Like__Ike.......And__PCCs!!
>>
>> down with pantographs ---- UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!!!!!
>
Jim__Holland
I__Like__Ike.......And__PCCs!!
down with pantographs ---- UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!!!!!
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list