[PRCo] Re: Winter
James B. Holland
PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com
Wed Jun 1 06:02:46 EDT 2005
> Fred Schneider wrote:
>
>> .......And ...[]... impossible to make a [scale-model] Pittsburgh
>> low-floor properly sag at the ends. And all these manufacturers,
>> whether Bert Sas in HO or Leonid in O seem to think a Pittsburgh car
>> should be level. John Bromley just sent me a picture of 4398 on a
>> fantrip in 1955 ... very obvious that both ends are two inches lower
>> than the middle.
>
> James B. Holland wrote:
>
> Lettuce see -- 2" = 1/6th Foot. One "O"-Scale foot = 1/4".
>
> 1/6 X 1/4" == 1/24"
That 2" sag of yours, actually of the model, works out to be 1/43.5" in
HO-Scale!!
> Could the naked eye see this sag built into an PRCo low-floor model???
>
> Will the restoration of PTM 4398 Keep This Sag -- or will it be
> eliminated????
>
>
> As you say -- """impossible to make a [scale-model] Pittsburgh
> low-floor properly sag at the ends""" so why lament that the models
> don't portray this -- IF it could be seen?!?!?!
>
> (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D
> (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D
> (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D
> (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D
> (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D
> (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D (:>D
Jim__Holland
I__Like__Ike.......And__PCCs!!
down with pantographs ---- UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!!!!!
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list