[PRCo] Re: comparison with Cleveland
John Swindler
j_swindler at hotmail.com
Mon Mar 28 09:59:01 EST 2005
Wasn't there a reorganization around 1950? What underliners still existed
within Pittsburgh Railways (II) corporate structure by late 1950s/early
1960s???
Just wondering.
John
>From: "James B. Holland" <PRCoPCC at P-R-Co.com>
>Reply-To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>Subject: [PRCo] Re: comparison with Cleveland
>Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:08:30 -0800
>
>Ken & Tracie wrote:
>
> > To be fair to PRCo., the operating environment placed the cars in what
> > I believe (just my personal opinion) was the absolutely most intense
> > operating environment of any major North American traction system.
>
>
>In addition to PRCo being bled to death from all the Underlies so that
>money was not available for anything outside of maintenance, the filthy
>rotten air of Pgh. which rotted curtains off their rods in homes, the
>ultra-hostile city government, It Is A Wonder That PRCo survived At All.
>
> > Most original PAT management team members didn't think the remaining
> > car lines were going to last beyond 1969-70.
>
>
>Stated more precisely::: """Most original PAT management team
>members were Hades Bent on getting rid of TrolleyCars -- they didn't
>want Pgh. to have the largest operating antique trolleycar museum Right
>On City Streets!""" The deplorable conditions of the PCCs under
>({[pat]}) is a direct effect of this policy -- they were Purposely
>allowed to disintegrate.
>
> > Mark shared an absolutely heart breaking view of interurban car 1619
> > (attached link.)
>
>
>THAT IS A ({[pat]}) CAR ---- *NOT* PRCo. Yes,
>PRCo had its dings, dents, faded paint, fresh paint *spots* but I
>never saw a PRCo PCC look like the ({[pat]}) 1619!
>
>This is not the first time we have had this *discussion* And from the
>same source. I provided an email with Multiples of URLs showing
>*PRCo* PCCs in decent condition -- that email IS in the archives at
>dementia, but if I can find my copy I shall forward it.
>
>Cleveland PCCs should have been in decent shape -- they only operated
>6-years max and then ALL trolleycars disappeared from Cleveland and
>the people were left with Gutterliners!
>
>
>http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/mark1619.jpg
>
>
>
>Jim__Holland
>
>
>I__Like__Ike.......And__PCCs!!
>
>down with pantographs ---- UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!!!!!
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list