[PRCo] Re: PAT School Buses

[James B. Holland]

Fred Schneider wrote:
.
.
.

> It occurs to me that there were some problems in the early years with 
> charters, and school buses constituted a charter, because UMTA was 
> providing Federal support to these agencies and the charter operations 
> were funneling this support into a restricted area where it no longer 
> served the entire populace. If I can phrase this a different way, UMTA 
> was saying that you cannot use federal support to run a charter (and 
> since we gave you the bus or the trolley, that's
> federal support).

.
.
Believe that is just for DiseaseAls because private operators could 
claim that SEPTA //  ({[pat]})  SF-Muni  charters are  *-competing-*  
with them.       Doesn't apply to TrolleyCoaches and Rail Vehicles since 
they can't compete directly with DiseaseAls.
.
.
.
.
Jim__Holland


I__Like__Ike.......And__PCCs!!

down with pantographs ---- UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!!!!!