[PRCo] Re: Interurban Accidents

[prcopcc at p-r-co.com]

Never gave that much thought but could be similar.
.
Another point of psychology with bicyclists is that they represent a 
pinpoint on the highway - looking into a mirror to see if one is coming up 
on the left and one expects something Much Larger so bicyclists go unseen.   
Besides, bicycle Much More Maneuverable as they weave in and out and they 
can change position in a split second.
.
Had considered a bicycle for commute back and forth to work but believe that 
a bad decision.   Yes, It Is Legal - but that doesn't make it right - time 
for bicycles on the road is in the past - parks, dedicated bicycle  
*-paths-*  Not Lanes is what is needed.   Very Bad Mix of bikes and all 
other motor vehicles.
.
.
.
> Fred Schneider writes: 
>
> Then the logic must be the same when you set aside a lane for bicycles? 
> 
>  
> 
>>> John Swindler writes: 
>>>
>>> Of course the one I always like is when someone runs into the SIDE  
>>> of a train at a grade crossing (:>) 
>>>
>>> John 
>>>
>> .
>> .
>> Jim Holland wrote:
>> .
>> These side crashes  *-sometimes-*  have to do with psychology.
>> Many lrvs systems have center of the highway prw, Not At All
>> Unlike dividers on big highways like expressways and freeways. 
>> So a motorist in his left hand lane believes that nothing
>> operates to his LEFT.
.
.
.
.
Jim__Holland
.
I....Like....IKE__---__And....PCCs!
.
down...with...pantographs.......
.
UP___WITH___TROLLEYPOLES!!!