[PRCo] Re: Tylerdale
Fred Schneider
fwschneider at comcast.net
Fri Dec 29 22:29:51 EST 2006
My father once wrote a letter to Eastman Kodak complaining that there
was no color in his Kodachrome on a gray day and Kodak wrote back
that there was no color in the subject. Please note also that this
would have been Kodachrome 1 (Weston 8 or ASA 10) which exhibited a
lot less ability to render subtle differences in color than
Kodachrome 2 (ASA/ISO 25) that was introduced in the late 1950s.
That probably would have been on some winter snow scenes that he took
during World War II.
'
I can find a date for Kodachrome 25 being introduced and that was
1961. However, I know that it was originally called Kodachrome II
and was actually available sometime in the late 1950s under that name
but I cannot put a year on it. My recollection is that one or more
former Kodak engineers broke away with the old patents and went to
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing (3M) and produced briefly a film
called Dynachrome in the late 1950s which was the old Kodachrome 1
under another name. I never used it. I played with Kodacolor at
that time but didn't get into slides until 1960, and then made the
mistake of using Ektachrome (E3) resulting in a lot of magenta slides
today.
I truly suspect that the colors in that picture are as close as
you're going to get to realism and that the red and cream streetcar
is the only object on a gray day that had any color other than
various intensities of gray.
Fred3
On Dec 29, 2006, at 8:26 PM, Donald Galt wrote:
> It's unlikely that the landscape would have photographed totally
> colourless
> while 1707 would stand out in vivid, if approximate, PRCo livery.
> It seems
> evident that the somebody tinted the PCC on a b&w photograph.
> Tinting was a not
> uncommon skill back in the bad old days.
>
> The two photos are not taken from exactly the same spot. Compare
> the line poles
> in relation to the Buick (?, Oldsmobile?).
>
> On a related subject, I'm a little surprised at how many duplicate
> pictures
> Derrick is storing in these files - second copies of many,
> including these two,
> and no less than six of <Tylerdale 0096 195xxxxx RSchramm.jpg>. No
> problem if
> there is plenty of room, but possibly more than needed.
>
> Don Galt
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list