[PRCo] PCC
Jim Holland
prcopcc at p-r-co.com
Fri Feb 2 16:36:06 EST 2007
Here!! Here!!!
.
Hear!! Hear!!!
.
Play It Again, Sam!!!!!!!
.
"""It is obsolete, but well proven."""
.
.
.
Jim
.
.
.
.
Boris Cefer wrote:
.
> It is obsolete, but well proven. It has been in service all over the
> world for more than 70 years and there is not much to improve on it.
> It reached the perfect phase of development many years back while all
> the modern semiconductor propulsion systems have relatively short
> career and they age far more rapidly, being pushed out by a new design
> almost every day.
>
> B
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> "Fred Schneider" <fwschneider at comcast.net> wrote::
>
>> Those motors have not be made in years. Just because New York City
>> has always specified obsolete technology doesn't been the rest of the
>> industry is so far behind the curve. The New York City Transit
>> Authority has always had a reputation for buying obsolete
>> hardware. I would say that DC motors are rapidly being pushed
>> out of the business by AC motor because the AC motors require very
>> limited maintenance but I would need to get someone else to tabulate
>> the numbers for me.
>>
>> But my point was the entire PCC control package is obsolete technology.
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list