[PRCo] Re: PCC
Boris Cefer
westinghouse at iol.cz
Sat Feb 3 02:37:20 EST 2007
Some might not like it :-D
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Holland" <prcopcc at p-r-co.com>
To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:36 PM
Subject: [PRCo] PCC
> Here!! Here!!!
> .
> Hear!! Hear!!!
> .
> Play It Again, Sam!!!!!!!
> .
> """It is obsolete, but well proven."""
> .
> .
> .
> Jim
> .
> .
> .
> .
> Boris Cefer wrote:
> .
>
> > It is obsolete, but well proven. It has been in service all over the
> > world for more than 70 years and there is not much to improve on it.
> > It reached the perfect phase of development many years back while all
> > the modern semiconductor propulsion systems have relatively short
> > career and they age far more rapidly, being pushed out by a new design
> > almost every day.
> >
> > B
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > "Fred Schneider" <fwschneider at comcast.net> wrote::
> >
> > But my point was the entire PCC control package is obsolete technology.
> >
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list