[PRCo] Re: pat__service__cuts__2007.01.23-changed to 2/1/07
Joshua Dunfield
joshuad at cs.cmu.edu
Tue Feb 6 19:52:08 EST 2007
John Swindler wrote:
> It's a six zone trip in Philly. The soaking of the airline passengers is
> even more blatent at Newark. Some have suggested it is to keep the cab
> drivers happy. I suspect it is a management decision not to let transit
> interfere with the parking garage cash flow.
The only thing in Zone 6 is Trenton. PHL is Zone 5. Which, including
"Zone C", is technically the sixth zone.
I don't know, the Newark soaking may be an accurate assessment of what
the market will bear.
> The 28X comments are interesting. Busways may be ok, but the buses still
> get stuck in rush hour traffic. Looked at experience with Overbrook LRT vs
> South busway schedules at city end, then wondered whose decision it was to
> go with an Airport busway (to use original selling point) rather then light
> rail.
Building anything, LRT or busway, all the way out to the airport would have
cost a lot more. And unlike the busway, you can't get a one-seat ride from
a "partway" LRT.
The Wabash bridge component would have helped a little, but as I recall, 28Xs
would still have had to traverse downtown streets.
-j.
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list