[PRCo] Re: PCCs in Operation
Joshua Dunfield
joshuad at cs.cmu.edu
Thu Jan 18 16:37:38 EST 2007
Jim Holland wrote:
> There may be a line that is crossed somewhere on the ADA issue.
> Special platforms were built at stops for wheelchairs; portable ramp
> from TrolleyCar to platform is set in place manually by the operator on
> PCCs. Don't know requirements about older equipment. I may
> have heard but don't remember. Activists have considerable
> influence in SF as most seem to know.
The ADA tried pretty hard to not cause massive disruption in the short term.
Historic routes are exempt; vehicles already in use in 1990 are exempt.
(See Section 12142 of the ADA:
http://finduslaw.com/americans_with_disabilities_act_of_1990_ada_42_u_s_code_chapter_126
)
The "PCC-II"s on the 15 were rather obviously remanufactured, so they're not
exempt. OTOH, most of the Market-Frankford and Broad Street Subway stations,
even important ones like 15th/City Hall, are not ADA-compliant. I assume they
fall under 12147(b)(1)(2)(B):
(B) Extension for extraordinarily expensive structural changes
The Secretary may extend the 3-year period under subparagraph
(A) up to a 30-year period for key stations in a rapid rail or
light rail system which stations need extraordinarily expensive
structural changes to, or replacement of, existing facilities;
except that by the last day of the 20th year following July 26,
1990, at least 2/3 of such key stations must be readily
accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities.
At their current rate I doubt SEPTA will make the deadline, unless they've
managed to interpret "key stations" to leave out most of Center City.
-j.
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list