[PRCo] Re: 1450
Bob Rathke
bobrathke at comcast.net
Sat Apr 5 16:23:35 EDT 2008
All of the 5-Spring Hill line from Spring Garden Avenue to the loop at
Buente St. was gantlet catenary.
I've always used the term "catenary" - it started in the 1940's from my
interest in mainline railroad electrification. Some things are difficult to
change.
Bob 4/5/08
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 2:18 PM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: 1450
> Mr. Rathke
>
>
> Interesting that you say catenary but guess that is 'morphing' current
> terminology with older systems isn't it. I really don't want to nitpick
> definitions but we simply referred to the 'trolley wire' as just that or
> overhead didn't we.
>
> That is gantlet / gauntlet construction overhead to avoid the use of frogs
> for whatever reason. This was quite common on PRC wasn't it. Overbrook
> single track south of the junction was strictly gantlet; longer sections
> of single track like Washington and further out on Charleroi were single
> contact wire with directional frogs at sidings.
>
> Gantlet was used in Carnegie at the RR underpass
> http://tinyurl.com/3klkvy and also on the 5 line and many other places
> too numerous to list at the moment.
>
> Car 1450 was chartered by Mr. Volkmer and is featured in one of his all
> color books on PRC.
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Bob Rathke <bobrathke at comcast.net>
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> Sent: Saturday, April 5, 2008 8:01:39 AM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: 1450
>
> Agreed. After checking the 1959 PTM PRC map, I can see the track layout in
> Duquesne.
>
>
> Bob 4/5/08
>
> - PRC 1450 identified as 53-Carrick, but I don't think so. Looks like it
> has a 2-line destination sign. Note the PRC "route information" easel
> sign at the right curb. The 2-wire catenary and signal suggest a double
> track line that went to one track for the intersection curve, or maybe a
> lead to a loop. Can anyone identify the location?
>
> http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/1450-53.jpg
>
>> -- ArtS32 at aol.com wrote:
>>
>> In a message dated 4/4/2008 9:00:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>> bobrathke at comcast.net writes:
>> http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/1450-53.jpg
>>
>> I would take a shot of this being in the town of Duquesne.
>>
>> Art Swartz
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster
> Total Access, No Cost.
> http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list