[PRCo] Re: New York Times Streetcar Article

[Richard Allman]

there's a new Indian place that some of our Indian residents in our hopital 
and some of the Indian-American medical student say is best in Phila. in the 
old Ben Franklin Hotel @ 9th and Chestnut-next time! Harrisburg bottomed 
out? That would be welcome news. Maybe better leadership? It makes a 
difference. Look @ the 2 river towns on the Schuykill: Norristown and 
Conshahocken. I would have picked Norristown as more likely for 
gentrification and comeback, but (despite the for last week) the clear 
winner has been Conshahocken.  Corrupt, incompetent government seems to have 
been the clear culprit in Norristown. And I know Harrisburg went through a 
rough period of incompetence and corruption. But Norristwon is now clearly 
the worst county seat in the region(unless you count Camden!)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Schneider Fred" <fwschneider at comcast.net>
To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:37 AM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: New York Times Streetcar Article


> Rich,
>
> I need to take you to Passage of India restaurant and introduce you
> to Lena and Vishnu Shenoy, the owners.
>
> http://www.passagetoindiapa.com/
>
> There is also several great Italian places downtown.
>
> Harrisburg was probably at its worst in the 1970s and 1980s.   It's
> star is ascending.  The worst blow, just like Pittsburgh, was when
> Bethlehem Steel faltered in Steelton in the 1980s.  There is a
> replacement steel company but it does not employ nearly the number of
> people that Bethlehem had.
>
> Please also notice that when I am throwing out employment data, I'm
> tossing around metropolitan statistical area data and not cities.
> By definition an MSA is either a city of 50,000 people or more or a
> city with a prescribed population density (that last clause was
> inserted in 1990 or 2000 when we would have lost places like
> Harrisburg that were shrinking under 50,000 and we reduced the core
> city to a 10,000 to 50,000 range).   The county surrounding the core
> city is automatically included.   Lancaster County, Pennsylvania is
> automatically included because Lancaster City is over 50,000.
> Philadelphia County is automatically included with Philadelphia City,
> in that case because they are co-terminus.  Beyond that, a requisite
> number of people from surrounding counties must commute into the core
> county for work to add them to the MSA.  We have since tweaked the
> commuting patterns from 15%  to 25% in recent years.   We look first
> for the largest county with 25% and add it.   Then we look for the
> next county that has 25% or more of its population commuting to work
> in the first two counties.   Then we hunt for a county that has 25%
> or more of its people working in the first three counties, and so on
> until we run out of counties that qualify.
>
> Some states publish county and city data.   Pennsylvania does.   But
> those data or not readily available on line so I don't look for it to
> make comparisons with other capitals.   So I can only look at Albany
> or Cheyenne or Philadelphia or Richmond as MSAs and not as cities.
> By the same token, I can not easily look at Williamsburg, Virginia as
> a city.   I have to look at it as part of Norfolk - Newport News -
> Hampton.
>
> Is that fair?   That depends on who you talk to.   I remember one
> character from the Chamber of Commerce in Port Jervis PA who argued
> with me that he could not understand why his city was included in the
> Middletown NY MSA / New York City CMSA.   The lunacy or logic of it
> simply escaped his brain.   But the fool attended the conferences in
> Washington when OMB reclassified Pike County PA into that area.   He
> understood.   He just believed his county was more important by
> itself.   He simply wasn't willing to admit that 65% of the workers
> in his area actually crossed the Delaware River and went into New
> Jersey and New York states to work and there was no way you were
> going to convince him.   If you want a lot of heavy reading, the link
> below goes to the Federal Register.   You can read all about it.  But
> I don't expect anyone to do it.
>
> http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/metroareas122700.pdf
>
> But at least now you know why Allegheny, Butler, Washington, Beaver,
> Fayette and Westmoreland counties are all part of the Pittsburgh MSA
> or labor market.
>
> On Aug 20, 2008, at 10:03 AM, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Richard Allman wrote:
>>
>>> what about our great state capital city? Unless I'm missing
>>> something, it's
>>> still a dump. A few years ago the Inquirer ran an article entitled
>>> something
>>> like "Harrisburg:Is this any place to have a state capital?" and
>>> subtitled
>>> "not  even a nice place to visit" (as oppposed to places that are
>>> nowhere to
>>
>> Harrisburg seems not bad to me; It certainly has more ethnic food, for
>> instance, than other larger cities I've been to. There are
>> recreational
>> opportunities. The big thing for me would have been that because of
>> its
>> size, a dearth of the sort of touring musical acts coming that I'd
>> like to
>> see. But that's an issue in Pittsburgh too.
>>
>> In some respects "it depends where in the city you are"
>>
>>
>
>
>