[PRCo] Fwd: Would Fineview be abandoned today?
Schneider Fred
fwschneider at comcast.net
Sat Dec 13 20:17:42 EST 2008
ACCIDENTLY HIT SEND BEFORE FINISHING. DISREGARD LAST ONE & READ
THIS ONE.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Schneider Fred <fwschneider at comcast.net>
> Date: December 13, 2008 8:15:01 PM EST
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> Subject: Would Fineview be abandoned today?
>
> Bob Rathke pushed my buttons the other day. I am not willing to
> let something fall by the wayside without trying to come up with a
> decent answer. Attached to this letter is a Microsoft Excel
> spreadsheet that compares 2008 and 1948 Lougee report data for
> weekday passengers in Pittsburgh. The Lougee Report only gives
> annual averages ... for want of a better way to do it, I did not
> adjust seasonally ... I simply assumed that summer and winter were
> the same (they never are) but I assumed that 80% of the riders were
> weekdays (5/7ths of the days is 71 percent ... is 80% a tad low?
> Probably not because a lot of people were still working Saturday
> mornings. It's close.
>
> There is an even bigger problem with making any comparisons and
> that is that the routes in 1948 are far different from most of the
> routes today. Bob Rathke's lines up in Troy Hill or Spring Hill
> or Spring Garden actually go all the way up in the country to Ross
> Garage (Keating) today. The old 8 Perrysville line doesn't stop
> at Keating any more but goes all the way to West View. The old 11
> East Street goes to Ross Garage Park and Ride. But there is a
> West View Express that uses the I-279 expressway but it only runs
> part-time. So most of the West View riders now go in Perrysville
> Avenue. Down in Manchester, all the routes (17, 18, 19 and 20)
> have been rolled into one line. Fineview has been combined with
> the old Charles Street shuttle. That is only part of how the
> city's route structure has been changed.
>
> Remember 96 East Liberty - 62nd St? Well, guys, it doesn't go to
> 62nd St. anymore. It crosses the Highland Park Bridge and goes up
> to Harmar Garage in O'Hara Township. And remember 94 Aspinwall
> and 95 Butler Street? Well, they don't end there ... they've been
> combined with the old West Penn, or later Community route up the
> valley. 94 now runs to Cheswick. 73 Highland doesn't go
> downtown. There are all sorts of variants of 62 and 63 Trafford
> today.
>
> I gave you a smattering of the changes I had to cope with for the
> last three days in this analysis. If you want to make sense of
> it, you can go on like and pull up all the PAT schedules. They
> all have maps.
>
> Point is guys, is easier to come up with some reasonable number of
> weekday fares in 1948 than it is to allocate the passengers today
> on some comparable route to compare to the old route.
>
> But I've tried.
>
> The important considerations are these:
>
> Allegheny County's population peaked about 1960 at 1.628 million
> and then began to implode. In 2000 the census takers enumerated
> 1.220 million people, a drop of about 400,000 people or 25 percent.
>
> Pittsburgh City had somewhere under 700,000 people at the end of
> World War II. The peak census year was 1950 with 676,806 but a lot
> of suburban homes had already been built between 1945 and 1950.
> In 2000 the census takers counted 334,963 people in Pittsburgh. I
> found one website that suggests that Pittsburgh is reversing the
> trend but I found an even more telling one and that is that
> Pittsburgh School District enrollments have plummeted by one-third
> since the year 2000. Maybe some kids are going to charter schools
> or other private schools but I think this is telling me that the
> general population decline is continuing unabated and that the city
> probably has fewer than 300,000 people today ... down by more than
> 55 percent since 1945.
>
> So what happened to the transit patronage?
>
> The typical bus route today is hauling somewhere between -75% and
> -95% of the passengers that were on it in 1948. And 1948 already
> represented a stinging drop from 1945 because we had almost caught
> up to the demand for new motor cars. The worst lines of all are
> those in the bottom lands --- the mill towns. Route 56B Hazlewood
> is almost identical to the old 55 East Pitsburgh via Homestead and
> 2nd Ave ... it has lost 94.4 percent of the business it had in 1948.
>
> The best routes are the light rail lines, largely because they were
> in neighborhoods that expanded last. The interurbans actually had
> very low patronage; the areas beyond Castle Shannon didn't
> completely fill in with homes until after the Washington and
> Charleroi lines were torn up. Remember my picture of the
> weathered barn under the thunder clouds in the Bill Middleton's
> book The Time of the Trolley? That farm was just north of where
> South Hills Village Mall is sited today. As a result, the rail
> patronage is only 30 percent lower than those routes moved in 1948
> and most of that probably relates to the inner (abandoned portion)
> of route 38 Mount Lebanon, 49 Beltzhoover and of course to the
> declines in office importance downtown.
>
> Now, how likely would continued operation of routes 21 and 40 be
> other than to a railfan who dreams about it? In the late 1940s
> when General Electric was still trying to push electric vehicles,
> they suggested that you needed enough revenue passengers to fill a
> PCC car every five minutes to make it practical, and that a trolley
> bus worked well in a 5 to 7 minute envelope and beyond that diesels
> would earn you money.
>
> OK ... Lets run the numbers that GE was telling us. A filled PCC
> every five minutes ...
> Base period = 12 times an hour x in or out x 14 hours x 56 people
> = 9,408 people
> Base period in the other direction = 12 times an hour x in or out x
> 14 hours x 25 people = 4,2000 people
> Evening = 6 times an hour x 4 hours x 30 people x 2 directions =
> 1440 people
> Very late evening = 4 times an hour x 2 hours x 30 people x 2
> directions = 480 people
> Owl service = 4 hours x 1 trip hour x 2 directions x 15 people =
> 120 people
> Rush hours = 4 hours x 12 additional trips an hour x 150 people =
> 7,200 people
> Total = 22848
>
> When Pittsburgh Railways ordered the 1700s, at least routes 55, 56,
> 68, 76, 82, 87, 88 and 94 qualified for reinvestment according to
> the G. E. formula. Today there isn't anything that comes even
> close. The East Busway all-stops local has almost 10,000 riders
> on a weekday and that is heaviest bus route in the system.
>
>
>

>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list