[PRCo] Re: 3800 Series LOST
Edward H. Lybarger
trams2 at comcast.net
Wed May 7 09:29:27 EDT 2008
Brown and Scanlon (and maybe a third person) bought 3756. Bowker paid for
1138.
-----Original Message-----
From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
[mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org] On Behalf Of Fred
Schneider
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 8:41 AM
To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
Subject: [PRCo] Re: 3800 Series LOST
If memory serves, Bob Brown paid for 3756.
On May 7, 2008, at 8:38 AM, John Swindler wrote:
> Hi Herb
>
> Perhaps it was not a favorite car series with someone with deep
> pockets? And it was a single end car.
>
> If that was a consideration, and I would not be surprised if that was
> (maybe we need to ask Art Ellis) it is remarkable that 1138 was saved.
> But with 1138, it might have been viewed as an opportunity to save a
> PCC before a public authority took over. And PRC, at that point,
> might have been willing to give PTM/PRMA/PERC the benefit of the doubt
> and quote an attractive price. Just guessing.
>
> I was surprised at how few the membership was in the 1950s. At that
> time, the museum concept was in competition with those who's focus was
> taking pictures of fantrip cars. As others have said, just be
> thankful for what did get saved.
>
> Suspect there was too much scrap value in a 3800 and WP 700s to be
> affordable. After all, wasn't the typical wage then around a buck an
> hour, or about $2,000 per year???
> Even 3756 barely made it to Arden. Wasn't it a last minute
> acquisition by an individual???
>
> There is a lot of speculation above that others more knowledgeable
> should comment on.
>
> John> Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 22:28:35 -0700> From:
> hrbran at sbcglobal.net> Subject: [PRCo] Re: 3800 Series LOST> To:
> pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org> > So how does this explain why PTM
> did not save a 3800 ??????> Fred Schneider <fwschneider at comcast.net>
> wrote: It would cost money to buy, money to move, it doesn't fit in >
> everyone's back yard, and the neighbors don't particularly like such >
> toys in your back yard.> > About 25 years ago Dave Hamley was
> projecting slides for my > edification and enjoyment. Several of them
> showed a gasoline > locomotive he once had stored in his garage in a
> nice suburban > neighborhood outside of Pittsburgh. He had rolled it
> out into the > driveway for the picture. In the background was a
> neighbor dressed
> > in a white shirt. Dave proceeded to tell how he cranked up the >
> engine. When the engine fired, all of the water that had > accumulated
> in the exhaust system came up the stack. It washed the
> > dirt out of the muffler and stack. The neighbor's!
> white shirt was > no longer white.. It was never again white.
> There was no bleach on > the market that could possibly make it white.
> That should give > insights into why your neighbor might not want any
> large steel > objects in your yard.> > In my township such objects are
> simply forbidden by ordinance. We > are note even permitted to work on
> our automobiles in our driveways > because of one guy who collected
> too many cars.> > > On May 6, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Jerry Matt Matsick
> wrote:> > > Content-Type: text/plain> >
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit> > Herb> > Good Buddy Mark and I often
> talk about the reason a 3800 series car > > was> > not saved?
> I remember them quite well in the late 40s and early > > 50s on
> the> > Charleroi Interurban route! A Beautiful Car!> >> > --> >
> From the River City by the Sea!> > Jerry "Matt" Matsick> >
> "Jacksonville"> >> >> > -------------- Original message from Herb
> Brannon > > > ---------------------------------> : -------------->
> >> >> >> Since!
> we are on the topic of "saved" PRCo cars.......> >> Why was a 3800
> se ries interurban never saved?? They were around > >> until 1950. It>
> >> seems someone would have tried to get one off the scrap pile.> Fred
> >> Schneider wrote:> >> PST 14 and 78 were not operational.
> The other revenue fleet was> >> marked in service but not everything
> was run. Of course that> >> excludes 4398, and Pittsburgh 1100 series
> PCC and a whole lot of> >> stuff in the Blimp Hanger which is not in
> the revenue fleet.> >>> >> On May 6, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Jerry Matt
> Matsick wrote:> >>> >>> Mark M and myself wonder what "cars" actually
> were operational this> >>> past weekend? Both of us would have given
> anything to be there as> >>> it looked like a fantastic time.> >>> --
> > >>> From the River City by the Sea!> >>> Jerry "Matt" Matsick> >>>
> "Jacksonville"> >>>> >>>
> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Herb Brannon> >>> >> Greetings From America's
> North Coast> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Attached file removed by Ecartis and put at
> URL below --> > !
> -- Type: image/jpeg> > -- Size: 92k (94795 bytes)> > -- URL :
> http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/3800% > >
> 20south%20of%20Charleroi.jpg> >> >> >> > > > > > Herb Brannon> >
> Greetings From America's North Coast> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> _________________________________________________________________
> Make Windows Vista more reliable and secure with Windows Vista Service
> Pack 1.
> http://www.windowsvista.com/SP1?WT.mc_id=hotmailvistasp1banner
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list