[PRCo] Re: 88 Transit and Suburban
Phillip Clark Campbell
pcc_sr at yahoo.com
Wed Apr 29 15:19:10 EDT 2009
Mr.Lybarger;
Thank you for this information. 'Blue Ridge' sounds more appropriate for
Kentucky doesn't it. I remember the name but that is all. Very interesting
and varied history.
Phil
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Edward H. Lybarger <trams2 at comcast.net>
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 5:28:01 PM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: 88 Transit and Suburban
>
> Blue Ridge Lines competed with PRCo on both interurbans. PRCo competed with
> itself on Charleroi with a bus route that didn't make it into the
> Depression. Greyhound acquired Blue Ridge in 1955, then sold the
> Washington-Wheeling service about 1959 to Suburban Lines, based in
> Washington. The Charleroi service was sold to 88 Transit Lines at about the
> same time. Both companies were owned by the drivers, which worked well for
> a while and then became a problem as rider numbers dropped and drivers
> retired but still wanted dividends. Finally Suburban was sold to Shortway
> out of Detroit, who bankrupt it pretty quickly. 88 Transit is still around,
> and contracts to Mid-Mon Valley Transit Authority.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
> [mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org] On Behalf Of Phillip
> Clark Campbell
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 2:20 PM
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> Subject: [PRCo] 88 Transit and Suburban
>
>
> > ----- Original Message ----
>
> > From: Edward H. Lybarger
> > To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:01:27 AM
> > Subject: [PRCo] Re: More photos
> >
> > 88 Transit and Suburban were not in business in the early '50s. They
> > were a late '50s result of Greyhound's decision to get out of the
> > local service business that they had acquired in 1955 through the
> > purchase of Blue Ridge from Potomac Edison.
> >
> This is more than I ever wanted to know about coaches but here you have
> piqued my interest, to a limited degree. Who competed with Charleroi and
> Washington service if any? Did 88 eventually operate these routes? I'm
> sorry; while I recognize the name 'Suburban' I do not remember anything
> about them. Was Suburban the competitor for Charleroi and Washington?
>
>
> Phil
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list