[PRCo] Re: PRC overhead
Ken and Tracie
ktjosephson at embarqmail.com
Sun May 17 19:43:58 EDT 2009
The rebuilt inner section of 85-Bedford used double brackets arms near the
Civic Center. The feeder cable was supposed to go underground along that
stretch, but a miscommunication resulted in either the trough for the feeder
not being installed, or maybe the trough was installed, but covered before
the feeder was installed. I forget the actual story.
K.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 5:57 AM
Subject: [PRCo] PRC overhead
>
> PRC used double bracket arms to support the overhead along the 87-Ardmore
> near Forest Hills. Did PRC employ either single or double bracket arm
> poles
> anywhere else?
>
> Gantlet (gauntlet?) overhead was not unusual. The sidings south of South
> Hills
> Junction on the Interurbans is a good example. Did the 49 on Climax and
> Gearing use gantlet? I believe this was the only usage in the South
> Hills.
>
> The 27-28 single track from Woodlawn to Idlewood was gantlet. Part of the
> 5 on Itin also had gantlet and a few other north lines may have as well.
> Every
> so often I notice such in photos. Are there others?
>
> For longer sections of single track PRC generally used directional frogs
> to
> insure proper tracking when facing the point; Drake south of Washington
> Jct is a good example as is much of the 65.
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list