[PRCo] Re: 'maybe' not East McKeesport

[Phillip Clark Campbell]

That is a possibility, Mr.Swindler; but that seems to be
the roadblock so far.  It seems we were thinking of a
locality of McKeesport as opposed to a separate town.
I never realized it was so far east.  The hills of East
McKeesport area are more congruent to the photo.
This is a very early photo so the area, RR, and Trolley
could have changed with time.  I was trying to read the
many 'billboards' on the fence but only the incomplete
piano sign is really visible.
Mr.Brashear has found other interesting photos at this
site in the past.  The website itself is a dinosaur that
loads very slowly and laboriously; it seems to overpower
resources.  I do have DSL but the site is annoying to
surf.

I am not going to dismiss the East McKeesport reference
so casually; it is obviously on the photo.


Phil




>________________________________
> From: John Swindler <j_swindler at hotmail.com>
>
>How about "east of McKeesport"???
>
>> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 08:20:19 -0800
>> From: pcc_sr at yahoo.com
>> Subject: [PRCo] Re: 'maybe' not East McKeesport
>> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
>> 
>> I wondered the same about a river, Mr.Swindler.
>> Coupling that with Mr.Barry's comments make the
>> position of RR and Trolley track seemed reversed
>> doesn't it.  RRs often follow river valleys.  Seems to
>> be a rather large yard possible here, or several 
>> passing tracks.  The few RR cars seem to be on
>> a grade compared to the "main" in the foreground.
>> 
>> Mr.Brannon noted the foliage; the hill seems steep
>> and high for Pgh. area.  Because of OH reference I 
>> 
>> thought of Ohio River Valley of Wheeling area.  It
>> has been 5-decades since being that way; I can't
>> remember steepness of hills.
>> 
>> To reconsider the E-McKeesport link I am looking at
>> the WP maps along the Youghiogheny yet all
>> alignments here seem to put the RR against the
>> river cancelling the alignment in the picture.  I was
>> never along this river so am not familiar with the hills;
>> they would still seem to be lower than those in
>> the picture.
>> 
>> The WP map shows "East McKeesport" as between
>> Wilmerding and Trafford.  There is a creek/river and RR
>> running east-west; the RR branches to both sides of
>> the river east of E-McKeesport.  This would then suggest
>> the Trafford line.  Hills here seemed to be higher than
>> those closer to Pgh.  Still much of the trolley line allowed
>> the RR closer to the river as I remember, at least latter
>> day alignment.  Mr.Barry may have hit the nail on the head.
>> 
>> 
>> "East McKeesport" must be marked on the photograph
>> for it to be included here.  Whether location or address
>> of photographer or other could be debated.
>> 
>> It seems the Stewarts left one "key word" out of their
>> description:  "1974"  Anyone familiar with local or PA
>> state license plates in 1906?
>> 
>> Has everyone assured their Black Friday deals?
>> 
>> Phil
>> 
>> >________________________________
>> > From: John Swindler <j_swindler at hotmail.com>
>> >I was wondering if there was a river off of the left side of the picture????  The collection includes some pix from southern Ohio.  Could this have been enroute, perhaps around the Steubenville area??  As a disclaimer, this is total speculation NOT based on any evidence.
>> >
>> >Happy Thanksgiving holiday
>> >John
>> >
>> >> From: mrb190 at pitt.edu
>> >> The first thing that came to my mind was that it was the Trafford route. But, the railroad tracks should be below the streetcar tracks.... Not sure.
>> >> ________________________________________
>> >> From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementix.org [pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementix.org] On Behalf Of Derrick Brashear [shadow at gmail.com]
>> >> so where the heck is it?
>> >> http://bradystewartphoto.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/20th-Century-Automobiles-Trucks-and-Boats/G0000flbWWbccdiw/I0000RZxXcxRETYA
>> >> 
>> >> --
>> >> Derrick
>