[PRCo] Fwd: pittsburgh-railways: rejmhj at netzero.net post needs approval

[Derrick Brashear]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ecartis <listar at dementix.org>
Date: Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 8:09 PM
Subject: pittsburgh-railways: rejmhj at netzero.net post needs approval
To: pittsburgh-railways-moderators at lists.dementix.org


This message was received for a list you are a moderator on, and
was marked for moderation due to the following reason:
Non-member submission to closed-post list.

To approve this message and have it go out on the list, forward this to
pittsburgh-railways-repost at lists.dementix.org

If you wish to decline the post, change the 'apppost' below to 'delpost'.
If you wish to edit the post, change it to 'modpost' and edit the message
as needed - not all mail programs will work with modpost.

DO NOT DELETE THE FOLLOWING LINE.  Ecartis needs it.
// apppost 4F3862C6:7984.1:cvggfohetuenvyjnlf

>From rejmhj at netzero.net Sun Feb 12 20:09:26 2012
Received: from outbound-mail02.dca.untd.com
(outbound-mail02.dca.untd.com [64.136.47.36])
       by meredith.dementix.org (8.13.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id q1D19Ps4031103
       for <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:09:25 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netzero.net;
       s=alpha; t=1329095361;
       bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; l=0;
       h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:Content-Type;
       b=lAYpn4t5PyCao7KU1I+j531UIqmXmOfGLcxaaBk+qn20Np163RnYfcgsK17aYIbw/
        F3DwA69w5Lgb+BGe0lwojphNGUKiV7wb57rQ7eHTtIVNq3KdUL9BiEZ1siJJdE6zwq
        KgHAZClTfhf44DR59WSZKrMcJaiwPnRSev73uV3Q=
X-UOL-TAGLINE: true
Received: from outbound-bu1.dca.untd.com (webmail07.dca.untd.com
[10.171.12.147])
       by smtpout05.dca.untd.com with SMTP id AABHVS2W7A4WZVEA
       for <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org> (sender <rejmhj at netzero.net>);
       Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:08:45 -0800 (PST)
X-UNTD-OriginStamp: njdm+/IPFK40oO4eNHiZfpYNvji5A9rLY3QJ+BwWlPz6lTSg1cK+gg==
Received: (from rejmhj at netzero.net)
 by webmail07.dca.untd.com (jqueuemail) id RZCS442C; Sun, 12 Feb 2012
17:08:22 PST
Received: from [74.60.179.76] by webmail07.dca.untd.com with HTTP:
       Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:08:16 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [74.60.179.76]
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: "rejmhj at netzero.net" <rejmhj at netzero.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:08:16 GMT
To: ge13031 at yahoo.com
Cc: billvigrass at verizon.net, oerm196 at yahoo.com, hassel8 at comcast.net,
       jackmay135 at gmail.com, dwightlong at verizon.net, pfuhler at msn.com,
       tracksofnyc at gmail.com, fwschneider at comcast.net,
       artwheeler at trolleybuses.net, pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
Subject: Re: 1893 version of a PCC truck
X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0
Message-Id: <20120212.200816.11894.1 at webmail07.dca.untd.com>
Content-type: text/plain
X-UNTD-BodySize: 3096
X-ContentStamp: 2:2:2236076425
X-MAIL-INFO: 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
       1f4e8f2bbf6f9b67ba3b2b83dbe34ecf
X-UNTD-Peer-Info:
10.171.12.147|webmail07.dca.untd.com|outbound-bu1.dca.untd.com|rejmhj at netzero.net
X-Spam-Score: 2.278 (**)
ADDR_NUMS_AT_BIGSITE,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_HTML
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-Greylist: Delayed for 26:38:13 by milter-greylist-1.6rc1
(meredith.dementix.org [128.2.235.26]); Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:09:26
-0500 (EST)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Somewhere in the files I have a shot or drawing of a similar truck
proposed in the US - I forget the proposer's name, but it was similar
vintage.  It is quite incorrect to relate it in any way to ERPCC,
which according to Sy Kashin looked at the idea but rejected it as
having too many maintenance implications.  The monomotor scheme works
OK if you are careful with maintenance, but is weighty because you
have cast steel from axle to axle.  There was a PCC in the Hague that
was equipped with DuWag monomotor trucks as a test, and I did ride it.
 It didn't ride any better and the maintenance engineer there said it
increased the car weight by no small amount.  Eventually the trucks
were sold to Dusseldorf.
Russ Jackson
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Dennis Lamont <ge13031 at yahoo.com>
To: billvigrass at verizon.net, "rejmhj at netzero.net" <rejmhj at netzero.net>
Cc: oerm196 at yahoo.com, hassel8 at comcast.net, jackmay135 at gmail.com,
dwightlong at verizon.net, pfuhler at msn.com, tracksofnyc at gmail.com,
fwschneider at comcast.net, artwheeler at trolleybuses.net,
pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
Subject: Re: 1893 version of a PCC truck
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:39:48 -0800 (PST)

A little before its time EH WOT ! Dennis
____________________________________________________________
53 Year Old Mom Looks 33
The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/4f38629df13a4129370bst05duc
// eompost 4F3862C6:7984.1:cvggfohetuenvyjnlf