[PRCo] Re: PRC Rt. 23
Derrick Brashear
shadow at gmail.com
Mon Feb 20 15:57:07 EST 2012
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Dwight Long <dwightlong at verizon.net> wrote:
>
> List
>
> Well, I see that the dreaded ICKYCartis has done it again. In spite of my
> best efforts to foil its evil ways by embedding the fots in the body of my
> email, it is way too clever for this non-programmer and managed to pluck
> them out of it and send them to photo purgatory.
i promise you, they will never be passed through. Ever. The person who wrote
that support was very thorough in testing.
Hi.
> This is another example of a very skillful programmer who has managed to
> provide an elegant solution to a non-existent problem,
Just because you don't believe my explanation of the problem doesn't mean
it wasn't true. The system is hosted for free for me, and I respect the network
of the host. You send in one file. It would send out N copies. Always. Even
if the person would never read it.
> Fred, Dennis and I and maybe others on this list belong to another
> rail-oriented discussion group which does not bother itself with list
> servers.
And then when someone changes email addresses, or wants out, they
can't, because
they say "stop copying me!" and unless everyone stops replying to any old
mail in the thread, it doesn't work. If you like, I'll forward you
just such a request from
Russ Jackson and then the N more replies that went to his work address
after he asked.
So, just because it's not a problem *you* have...
> Emails, which MAY contain photos, graphs, and the like, are sent
> to a list of presumably interested recipients. Replies can be forwarded by
> "reply all" and the list can be easily tailored to add or remove folks with
> perceived interest or disinterest.
Can be, based on the sender's idea of the receiver's interest.
Well, I know my interest better than you. At least, I did when I got
up this morning. I suppose I
could reverify.
> It works very well.
Except when it doesn't.
> Pittsburgh-railways at dementix is a great group but its mechanism is unduly
> confining and frustrating.
It's horrible. Except for all the other crappy things.
--
Derrick
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list