[PRCo] Re: Fw: Photo identification

[Dwight Long]

Phil

Oh, ok, that explains it.  Thanks.

Dwight

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:49 PM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: Fw: Photo identification


> Mr.Long,
>
> Mr.Beveridge wrote that Mr.Strelick "thought it was Carson Street."
> As Mr.Beveridge didn't have contact with Mr.Strelick I assume this was
> written on the back of the photo, but I do not know that. Mr.Beveridge's
> email is the bottom quote below.
>
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Dwight Long <dwightlong at verizon.net>
>>To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:37 PM
>>Subject: [PRCo] Re: Fw: Photo identification
>>
>>
>>Phil
>>
>>The short answer is that it doesn't, since Carson St. is on the other side
>>of the river. But I don't get the context of why it was even mentioned?
>>
>>Dwight
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
>>To: "Pittsburgh-List" <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:49 AM
>>Subject: [PRCo] Fw: Photo identification
>>
>>
>>> Mr.Brashear said he wrote to Mr.Beveridge as well; here is his response.
>>> I assume the photo was marked on the back as "Carson" since he doesn't
>>> have contact. The picture is updated:
>>> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/scott_beveridge/8014098467/>
>>>
>>> How does this fit with Carson outbound of the Brady Bridge?
>>>
>>> Interesting point from Mr.Dietrich -- items may have been removed from
>>> the photo. If enlarged it also looks like reflection on the inside rear
>>> window of an auto. The photo itself is wanting. Maybe extraneous
>>> markings on the front of the photo were removed--maybe ink stains.
>>> Why else remove the sky?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Phil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Forwarded Message -----
>>>>From: Mr Scott Beveridge
>>>>To: Phillip Clark Campbell
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:32 AM
>>>>Subject: Re: Photo identification
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Phil
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the email. You are the second person to identify the location
>>>>of the photo as inbound at Second Street.
>>>>So I have corrected the cutline. I don't have any contact for Gary, who
>>>>thought the photo was taken on Carson Street.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You could probably reach him through the historical society.
>>>>http://www.monessenhistoricalsociety.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Scott
>>
>