[PRCo] Re: Schedules in street railway report
Phillip Clark Campbell
pcc_sr at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 27 11:05:28 EDT 2012
I did the same Mr.Long but then realized there must be another
explanation. It is only a 40-page book. It seems it can be
downloaded for phones but not for computer. Am I missing
something? One can read it online via computer. It would be
nice to have a copy.
Have you seen and read this new Prc book? A friend here is a
member of the organization and has his copy; he promised to
let me browse and read it later but I have not seen it.
Phil
>________________________________
> From: Dwight Long <dwightlong at verizon.net>
>To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
>Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:01 AM
>Subject: [PRCo] Re: Schedules in street railway report
>
>
>Phil
>
>Absolutely. It was my assumption, probably erroneous, that these numbers
>were cars assigned to the routes mentioned.
>
>Dwight
>
>> * To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
>> * Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
>> * From: "Dwight Long" <dwightlong at verizon.net>
>> * Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:34:18 -0400
>>> John > Only one car on Washington and two on Charleroi? > Either
>>> something is wrong here or I am missing something? > Dwight
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "John Swindler" <j_swindler at hotmail.com>
>>>> To: "Pittsburgh Railways" <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:45 PM
>>>> Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
>>
>>>> Just adding something else to ponder. Not from Pittsburgh digital
>>>> site.
>>>> (sending as email improves my chances of finding in future)
>>>> http://books.google.com/books?id=5XYrAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA9#v=onepage&q&f=false
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
>> To: "Pittsburgh-List" <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:54 PM
>> Subject: [PRCo] Schedules in street railway report
>>
>>
>> Mr.Long,
>>
>> This is number of cars per hour isn't it and may be the rush
>> hours only. In 1910 the Washington line thru to Pittsburgh
>> is just a year old isn't it. Hourly headway vs. 30-minute
>> headway for Charleroi. That reads better doesn't it.
>>
>>
>> Phil
>
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list