[PRCo] Re: Schedules in street railway report

[John Swindler]

  Thank you.  Makes a lot more sense.
 > From: dwightlong at verizon.net
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Schedules in street railway report
> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:01:56 -0400
> 
> 
> Phil
> 
> Absolutely.  It was my assumption, probably erroneous, that these numbers 
> were cars assigned to the routes mentioned.
> 
> Dwight
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
> To: "Pittsburgh-List" <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:54 PM
> Subject: [PRCo] Schedules in street railway report
> 
> 
> > * To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
> > * Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
> > * From: "Dwight Long" <dwightlong at verizon.net>
> > * Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:34:18 -0400
> >> John > Only one car on Washington and two on Charleroi? > Either 
> >> something is wrong here or I am missing something? > Dwight
> >>> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >>> From: "John Swindler" <j_swindler at hotmail.com>
> >>> To: "Pittsburgh Railways" <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:45 PM
> >>> Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
> >
> >>>   Just adding something else to ponder.  Not from Pittsburgh digital 
> >>> site.
> >>> (sending as email improves my chances of finding in future)
> >>> http://books.google.com/books?id=5XYrAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA9#v=onepage&q&f=false
> >
> >
> >
> > Mr.Long,
> >
> > This is number of cars per hour isn't it and may be the rush
> > hours only.  In 1910 the Washington line thru to Pittsburgh
> > is just a year old isn't it.  Hourly headway vs. 30-minute
> > headway for Charleroi.  That reads better doesn't it.
> >
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> > 
> 
>