[PRCo] Re: Schedules in street railway report

[Dwight Long]

Phil

Absolutely.  It was my assumption, probably erroneous, that these numbers 
were cars assigned to the routes mentioned.

Dwight

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
To: "Pittsburgh-List" <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:54 PM
Subject: [PRCo] Schedules in street railway report


> * To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
> * Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
> * From: "Dwight Long" <dwightlong at verizon.net>
> * Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:34:18 -0400
>> John > Only one car on Washington and two on Charleroi? > Either 
>> something is wrong here or I am missing something? > Dwight
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "John Swindler" <j_swindler at hotmail.com>
>>> To: "Pittsburgh Railways" <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:45 PM
>>> Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
>
>>>   Just adding something else to ponder.  Not from Pittsburgh digital 
>>> site.
>>> (sending as email improves my chances of finding in future)
>>> http://books.google.com/books?id=5XYrAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA9#v=onepage&q&f=false
>
>
>
> Mr.Long,
>
> This is number of cars per hour isn't it and may be the rush
> hours only.  In 1910 the Washington line thru to Pittsburgh
> is just a year old isn't it.  Hourly headway vs. 30-minute
> headway for Charleroi.  That reads better doesn't it.
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>