[PRCo] Re: Schedules in street railway report

[Herb Brannon]

There should be no "playing around" with the website necessary. For anyone
having a problem with the download it's a four-step process as follows:
1. Click on "save as pdf" on the original open page from settings symbol
(looks like a gear).
2. Enter security code asked for on next appearing page. DO NOT click on
red letters  above security code box even though it says "click here".
3. "Open With Adobe Reader" box will immediately appear and click "OK" at
bottom of  that box.
4. Save the.pdf file to your computer once it is open in Adobe Reader.




On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Dwight Long <dwightlong at verizon.net> wrote:

>
> Phil
>
>   You have to play around with the website for a while before
> you can get a pdf that can be printed, but it can be done.
>
>
>
> Dwight
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
> To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:05 AM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Schedules in street railway report
>
>
> >I did the same Mr.Long but then realized there must be another
> > explanation. It is only a 40-page book. It seems it can be
> > downloaded for phones but not for computer. Am I missing
> > something? One can read it online via computer. It would be
> > nice to have a copy.
> > Have you seen and read this new Prc book? A friend here is a
> > member of the organization and has his copy; he promised to
> > let me browse and read it later but I have not seen it.
> >
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>________________________________
> >> From: Dwight Long <dwightlong at verizon.net>
> >>To: pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org
> >>Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:01 AM
> >>Subject: [PRCo] Re: Schedules in street railway report
> >>
> >>
> >>Phil
> >>
> >>Absolutely. It was my assumption, probably erroneous, that these numbers
> >>were cars assigned to the routes mentioned.
> >>
> >>Dwight
> >>
> >>> * To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
> >>> * Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
> >>> * From: "Dwight Long" <dwightlong at verizon.net>
> >>> * Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:34:18 -0400
> >>>> John > Only one car on Washington and two on Charleroi? > Either
> >>>> something is wrong here or I am missing something? > Dwight
> >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> From: "John Swindler" <j_swindler at hotmail.com>
> >>>>> To: "Pittsburgh Railways" <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
> >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 8:45 PM
> >>>>> Subject: [PRCo] Re: wrong side of the river?
> >>>
> >>>>>   Just adding something else to ponder. Not from Pittsburgh digital
> >>>>> site.
> >>>>> (sending as email improves my chances of finding in future)
> >>>>>
> http://books.google.com/books?id=5XYrAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA9#v=onepage&q&f=false
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
> >>> To: "Pittsburgh-List" <pittsburgh-railways at dementix.org>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:54 PM
> >>> Subject: [PRCo] Schedules in street railway report
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Mr.Long,
> >>>
> >>> This is number of cars per hour isn't it and may be the rush
> >>> hours only. In 1910 the Washington line thru to Pittsburgh
> >>> is just a year old isn't it. Hourly headway vs. 30-minute
> >>> headway for Charleroi. That reads better doesn't it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Phil
> >>
> >
>
>
>


-- 
Herb Brannon
In Cuyahoga Valley National Park