[PRCo] *In Pittsburgh...* *......the Greatest City In The U.S.*
PC
pcc_sr at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 24 14:59:03 EST 2013
Mr.Brannon supplied the figures and I believe the website for Cleveland transit is where it was posted. As this was within the last
year or two I was surprized because of the recession. I made a point of checking (maybe a news article in Cleveland) and the
numbers were positive increase in ridership. I was amazed at the results. It is in the archives of this list but I am not looking for it.
Pc
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 11/24/13, Fred Schneider <fwschneider at comcast.net> wrote:
Subject: Re: [PRCo] *In Pittsburgh...* *......the Greatest City In The U.S.*
To: "Western PA Trolley discussion" <pittsburgh-railways at mailman.dementix.org>
Date: Sunday, November 24, 2013, 8:32 AM
Do not know where you find positive
Cleveland numbers…..
Since it was not posted to the website, I can only believe
the year over year steady gains were revenue losses or
ridership losses that impressed you.
Light rail, aka Shaker Rapid … Peak year was 1948 with
7.437 million. In 1996 they hauled 3.847
million. In 2012 it was 2.855 million fares.
The 1995 and 2013 numbers were those that the RTA reported
to APTA.
The heavy rail numbers for 1995 and 2013 sere 5.140 million
and 6.240 million. Herb Brannon once told
me that the highest average weekday volume before the
airport extension was around 50,000 a day … that would be
about 15 million a year.
Bus numbers for 1995 were 50.2 million and for 2012 38.5
million.
Overall, including demand responsive riders, it has
dropped 10.6 million a year since 1996, not
risen. It has dropped 22% while the
population has done down about 21% in the same period …
cannot tell exactly because we can only extrapolate the the
population drop in the intercensal
periods. But it looks like its going down
proportionally with the loss of people living in
Cleveland.
Here is the APTA website:
http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/ridershipreport.aspx
On Nov 24, 2013, at 8:10 AM, PC wrote:
> I was very much impressed with Cleveland transit
statistics Mr.Brannon; they realized year over year steady
gains. One would suspect such to be 'a' measure
> of economic health--people traveling back and forth to
work and-or to shopping. Yet the situation for the
nation is still bad; maybe Cleveland is still doing better
than the
> average nationally.
>
> The city has received some bad press with the women
captives recently released and negative police
reports. But such is possible most anywhere today.
>
> I have not been in Pgh in decades. I shall look
into these books.
>
>
> Phil
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pittsburgh-railways mailing list
Pittsburgh-railways at mailman.dementix.org
https://mailman.dementix.org/mailman/listinfo/pittsburgh-railways
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list