[PRCo] *In Pittsburgh...* *......the Greatest City In The U.S.*
PC
pcc_sr at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 24 15:45:05 EST 2013
Ridership gains 3-years in a row in Cleveland, 2010, 2011, 2012:::
http://www.riderta.com/annual/2012
>From the Red Line and the HealthLine to buses and Trolleys, more seats were filled as ridership was up. Last year, RTA provided 48.2 million passenger trips, an increase of more than 2 million over 2011. Overall, ridership grew by 4.8 percent in 2012. This is on top of a 3.6 percent increase last year, and a 4.0 rise the year before that. The Red Line had 500,000 more riders, representing a 9.1 percent gain. The Blue and Green Lines also grew by 4.1 percent, and the bus routes collectively increased by 3.5 percent. Since its introduction in 2008, the HealthLine has had healthy growth, and in 2012, it posted its fourth consecutive annual increase, up 3.0 percent. Finally, the Paratransit Service was even more vital to those needing assistance, increasing by 11.9 percent.
>From APTA:
http://www.apta.com/mediacenter/pressreleases/2012/Pages/120604_Ridership.aspx
2012 First Quarter Ridership Breakdown
Nationally, light rail (modern streetcars, trolleys, and heritage trolleys) ridership increased 6.7 percent in the first quarter of 2012. Twenty-five of twenty-seven light rail systems reported ridership increases. The ten light rail systems with the highest rates of growth were located in the following cities: Memphis, TN (45.7%); Salt Lake City, UT (34.1%); Seattle, WA – King County DOT (19.4%); Boston, MA (12.6%); Cleveland, OH (10.7%); Houston, TX (10.3%); Seattle, WA – Sound Transit (10.3%); Los Angeles, CA (9.9%); Sacramento, CA (8.5%); and St. Louis, MO (8.2%).
Fourteen out of fifteen heavy rail heavy rail (subways and elevated trains) systems reported ridership increases. Overall, heavy rail ridership increased by 5.5 percent nationwide. The ten heavy rail systems with the highest first quarter increases in ridership were in the following cities: Cleveland, OH (12.2%); San Francisco, CA (9.7%); Chicago, IL (8.9%); Baltimore, MD (7.8%); Boston, MA (6.4%); Jersey City, NJ (6.1%); New York, NY – MTA New York City Transit (5.6%); Lindenwold, NJ (4.7%); New York, NY – MTA Staten Island Railway (4.5%); and Miami, FL (4.2%).
Large bus systems reported an increase of 4.6 percent nationally. Bus systems in the following cities showed the top ten increases: Saint Louis, MO (15.6%); Dallas, TX (11.9%); Arlington Heights, IL (11.1%); Boston, MA (10.6%); Oakland, CA (10.5%); Ft. Lauderdale, FL (8.7%); Newark, NJ (8.0%); San Antonio, TX (8.0%); Washington, DC (7.9%). and Cleveland, OH (7.8%).
Here is an interesting historical record of transit in Cleveland from the first website quoted above:
http://www.riderta.com/history
Cleveland's HealthLine bus route could be model for Pittsburgh:
http://www.post-gazette.com/transportation/2013/06/20/Cleveland-s-HealthLine-bus-route-could-be-model-for-Pittsburgh/stories/201306200245
Pc
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 11/24/13, PC <pcc_sr at yahoo.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [PRCo] *In Pittsburgh...* *......the Greatest City In The U.S.*
To: "Western PA Trolley discussion" <pittsburgh-railways at mailman.dementix.org>
Date: Sunday, November 24, 2013, 11:59 AM
Mr.Brannon supplied the figures and I
believe the website for Cleveland transit is where it was
posted. As this was within the last
year or two I was surprized because of the recession.
I made a point of checking (maybe a news article in
Cleveland) and the
numbers were positive increase in ridership. I was
amazed at the results. It is in the archives of this
list but I am not looking for it.
Pc
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 11/24/13, Fred Schneider <fwschneider at comcast.net>
wrote:
Subject: Re: [PRCo] *In Pittsburgh...* *......the Greatest
City In The U.S.*
To: "Western PA Trolley discussion" <pittsburgh-railways at mailman.dementix.org>
Date: Sunday, November 24, 2013, 8:32 AM
Do not know where you find positive
Cleveland numbers…..
Since it was not posted to the website, I can only believe
the year over year steady gains were revenue losses or
ridership losses that impressed you.
Light rail, aka Shaker Rapid … Peak year was 1948 with
7.437 million. In 1996 they hauled 3.847
million. In 2012 it was 2.855 million fares.
The 1995 and 2013 numbers were those that the RTA reported
to APTA.
The heavy rail numbers for 1995 and 2013 sere 5.140
million
and 6.240 million. Herb Brannon once told
me that the highest average weekday volume before the
airport extension was around 50,000 a day … that would
be
about 15 million a year.
Bus numbers for 1995 were 50.2 million and for 2012 38.5
million.
Overall, including demand responsive riders, it has
dropped 10.6 million a year since 1996, not
risen. It has dropped 22% while the
population has done down about 21% in the same period …
cannot tell exactly because we can only extrapolate the
the
population drop in the intercensal
periods. But it looks like its going down
proportionally with the loss of people living in
Cleveland.
Here is the APTA website:
http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/ridershipreport.aspx
On Nov 24, 2013, at 8:10 AM, PC wrote:
> I was very much impressed with Cleveland transit
statistics Mr.Brannon; they realized year over year steady
gains. One would suspect such to be 'a' measure
> of economic health--people traveling back and forth
to
work and-or to shopping. Yet the situation for the
nation is still bad; maybe Cleveland is still doing better
than the
> average nationally.
>
> The city has received some bad press with the women
captives recently released and negative police
reports. But such is possible most anywhere today.
>
> I have not been in Pgh in decades. I shall look
into these books.
>
>
> Phil
More information about the Pittsburgh-railways
mailing list