[PRCo] Re: Headways Route 12 versus Route 9

John Swindler j_swindler at hotmail.com
Fri May 25 12:10:06 EDT 2001



You won't believe the number of PUC dockets I found on Pittsburgh Railways.  
And may be only tip of iceberg.  It was Pittsburgh Railways Company during 
1950s/60s.  However, it was Pittsburgh Railways Company (system) with 
underliers periodically listed prior to coming out of receivership around 
1952.  So there could well be separate listings for Monongahela Street 
Railway Co., Admore Street Railway, consolidated Traction Co., etc.  I've 
got a list for this afternoons viewing.

John

p.s. Oh yes, your question.  Reading and Conestoga searches will be 
intermingled with PRC searches.

p.s. to p.s.  Again, as Ed claims, I can't retire - too much to look up.



>From: "Fred W. Schneider III" <fschnei at supernet.com>
>Reply-To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>Subject: [PRCo] Re: Headways Route 12 versus Route 9
>Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 10:52:05 -0400
>
>
>No, John,
>
>I'm waiting for you to spend your free time at PennDOT getting out all
>of the Conestoga Traction DIA reports.  There is something that doesn't
>make sense.  Ben Rohrbeck claimed that CTC hauled 9 million people in
>1924 and that this was their best year.  I have trouble comprehending
>how they could have lost money in 1923, 1924, 1925, and blamed it on
>auto competition, and still it was their best year.  Doesn't make much
>sense does it.
>
>Fred
>
>John Swindler wrote:
> >
> > So I guess your waiting for me to check PUC docket A-79997 of 1953?
> >
> > John
> >
> > >From: "Fred W. Schneider III" <fschnei at supernet.com>
> > >Reply-To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> > >To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> > >Subject: [PRCo] Re: Headways  Route 12 versus Route 9
> > >Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 00:44:12 -0400
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Jim Holland wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > John Swindler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Why 15 minutes service:  Because "custom to operate the service as
> > > > > frequently as could be operated with one man".
> > > >
> > >So why did Pittsburgh Railways run route 12 every hour and let the
> > >motorman sit at Evergreen Road for 20 minutes or so every trip?
> > >Different schedule writer, different logic?
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com





More information about the Pittsburgh-railways mailing list