[PRCo] Fw: Re: Portland Green Line

[richard allman]

Phil-taste cannot be argued but a couple observations: the Tri Met Type 3 
cars( I think!) are a bit goofy looking but are functional beyond belief re: 
efficient boarding/ unboarding and ride quality. The new Siemens' cars I 
just happen to like a whole lot-became totally enamored of the design in San 
Diego 2-1/2 years ago for futuristic apearance and performance, but that's 
just me! What does a simple country doctor know about LRV design? RICH
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phillip Clark Campbell" <pcc_sr at yahoo.com>
To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 8:23 PM
Subject: [PRCo] Re: Portland Green Line


> Mr.Allman;
>
> I am not enamored of these low-floor cars;  I am more
> traditional and prefer the Bombardiers with standard
> floor.  When I ride the low-floor I look for a seat in the
> standard floor section, each end of the car.  I am
> concerned with side impact collisions;  something
> could put a whole new door in this equipment.  Maybe
> I will like them better when I really 'need' such an
> amenity.
>
> It is a different story if low-floor 3756 comes along
> isn't it.
>
> The Bombardier equipment is superb;  I am very
> favorably impressed.  Tri-Met known for attention to
> detail;  this is but one example isn't it.
>
>
> Phil
> Without  a   'coast'   but  not  a   'cause.'
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: richard allman <allmanr at verizon.net>
> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 3:07:13 PM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Portland Green Line
>
> every Tri MET train has one low floor car so the boarding is rather swift!
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Edward H. Lybarger" <trams2 at comcast.net>
> To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 8:20 AM
> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Portland Green Line
>
>
>> That's apples vs. oranges.  If you use that to select a transportation
>> mode,
>> that's one thing, but if you compare transit systems you have to look at
>> those areas.  And it's not just the ramp...it's the operator's time away
>> from the platform that's a big factor in the dwell time.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org
>> [mailto:pittsburgh-railways-bounce at lists.dementia.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Joshua
>> Dunfield
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 7:35 PM
>> To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>> Subject: [PRCo] Re: Portland Green Line
>>
>> 2009/9/16 Edward H. Lybarger <trams2 at comcast.net>:
>>> 22 mph isn't so bad when you figure that a New York express train does
>>> maybe
>>> 17 or 18. You have to look at the number of stops and the dwell time,
>>> which has increased most places because of the need to accommodate the
>>> handicapped patrons.
>>
>> If I'm comparing it to driving, walking, or biking, I really don't need 
>> to
>> look at the stops or the dwell time.  MAX wheelchair ramps are pretty
>> fast,
>> anyway.
>>
>> Fred: yes, I got that far, but I didn't see anything on that page that's
>> obviously an 80 page brochure.  I don't feel like going through
>> 15 links.
>>
>> -j.
>
>
>
>
>
>