[PRCo] Re: HO Ex-Louisville PCCs

[Herb Brannon]

There was a "trial" service around 1940 offered by a PCC demonstrator.
However, like PRCo 1095 in Cleveland, was not what, by the transit industry,
is defined as "revenue service".
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:20, Dwight Long <dwightlong at verizon.net> wrote:

> Herb
>
> Your second sentence is correct, but your first is only so if modified by
> the second.  At least PCCs got to Louisville and ran (for a nanosecond or
> so), unlike Denver, where the Denver Tramway Co. turned down the offer by
> St. Louis Car Co and LATL to borrow an LATL PCC in transit to that city.
>  The local newspaper even offered to pay the expenses of transshipment.  DTC
> turned them down flat.  Talk about having one's mind made up.  DTC and LATL
> were both the rare (in USA) Cape gauge, so it would have worked.
>
> Dwight
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Herb Brannon
>  To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>  Sent: Sunday, 21 November, 2010 11:28
>  Subject: [PRCo] Re: HO Ex-Louisville PCCs
>
>
>   While a few of these cars made it to Louisville, they never ran in that
>  city. No PCC ever ran in Louisville in revenue service. The majority of
> the
>  25 cars were shipped  directly from St Louis Car Company to Cleveland
>  Transit System, Cleveland, Ohio. They are ex-Cleveland cars, not
>  ex-Louisville.
>
>
>  On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 00:35, Phillip Clark Campbell <pcc_sr at yahoo.com
> >wrote:
>
>  > Mr.Allman;
>  >
>  > Beautiful models;  excellent overhead as well!
>  > Could you please share some more model photos?
>  >
>  > Mr.Robb----All Electric PCCs had slight angle of rear window
>  > above the belt line;  below the belt line was vertical,  at least
>  > on St.Louis Cars.  Air Cars had the same slope from above the
>  > windows to the floor, 8-degrees/30-min on Pgh cars.  I'll send
>  > you a scan of the Prc 17s rear elevation off list.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Phil
>  > Without  a   'coast'   but  not  a   'cause.'
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > ________________________________
>  > From: richard allman <allmanr at verizon.net>
>  > To: pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org
>  > Sent: Sat, November 20, 2010 11:35:17 PM
>  > Subject: [PRCo] Re: SLPS/SHRT/PTC/MUNI PCC Question
>  >
>  > Bill-Hmm-post-war MU: Boston, Toronto, Shaker,
>  > unless you also count Red Arow and Illinois Terminal.
>  > Attached is photo of a set of Toronto ex-Cleveland
>  > St. Louis -built MU PCC's-series A-12 @
>  > TTC-since you brought it up!
>  >  I built these around 6 years ago in HO scale.RICH
>  >
>  >
>  > ----- Original Message -----
>  > From: "Bill Robb" <bill937ca at yahoo.ca>
>  > To: <pittsburgh-railways at dementia.org>
>  > Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 11:29 AM
>  > Subject: [PRCo] Re: SLPS/SHRT/PTC/MUNI PCC Question
>  >
>  > > I also thought the pre-war cars were more graceful,
>  > > but during the last years of the PCCs I came to appreciate
>  > > the post-war front end was almost as graceful when
>  > > walking by stopped TTC 4300s at Yonge and Queen.
>  > > Unfortunately the post war back end drops straight down
>  > > from the roof line. The tapered pre-war rear end is my
>  > > favorite. I remember MU cars as having a less graceful profile
>  > > than the non-MU variety because the couplers cut the lines
>  > > off abruptly.
>  > > Bill
>  >
>  > http://lists.dementia.org/files/pittsburgh-railways/DSC_0324-1.JPG
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  --
>  Herb Brannon
>  In Cuyahoga Valley National Park
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Herb Brannon
In Cuyahoga Valley National Park